Smithfield Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Birmingham
Tract 01073001400 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 2,188 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Census tract 01073001400 covers part of the Smithfield Historic District area of Birmingham, AL, and scores 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,188. 50% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Birmingham and the region
Centroid at 33.5262, -86.8352 · click any tract to drill in
Why Smithfield Historic District scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Smithfield Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 70
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 96%Socioeconomic
- 15%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 32%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 3%Grade C
- 96%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 188Total filings over 11 yrs
- 4.90%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.5%Peak (2001)
- 6Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Smithfield Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 31.1%Housing insecurity
- 25.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 46.9%Food insecurity
- 44.0%SNAP enrollment
- 22.2%Transit barriers
- 17.2%No health insurance
- 18.8%Frequent mental distress
- 51.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Smithfield Historic District
The dominant input is economic stress at 10/10. SNAP participation runs 44.0% against 15.2% nationally. The poverty rate is 52%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Cost burden runs 60% here against 46.3% across Jefferson County. Disability prevalence runs 51.6% against 31.5% nationally.
Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. Set annual rent against average income of $33,140 and the ratio lands at 33%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10. Against the Jefferson County average of 4.3, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points.
Average gross rent is $914, 17% below the Birmingham average. Court records carry 188 eviction filings across 11 observed years. The worst year on record was 2001, when 6.5% of renter households were served.
This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Birmingham. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 4.9% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 01073001400
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073001400?
What is the average rent in tract 01073001400?
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073001400?
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073001400?
Is tract 01073001400 considered part of Smithfield Historic District?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073001400?
What share of households in tract 01073001400 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 01073001400 compare to Birmingham overall?
Was tract 01073001400 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham
Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.