Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally

Smithfield Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Birmingham

Tract 01073003002 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 2,550 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Tract 01073003002 sits in the Smithfield Historic District area of Birmingham eviction risk, AL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.2/10. Population here is 2,550. Average gross rent is $442, 60% below the Birmingham average.

Risk score

5.2

Moderate

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 28% Owners 52%

Tract context

Occupied units1,113

Renter share47.6%

SVI overall0.78

Poverty rate17.5%

Median income$34,740

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Birmingham and the region

Centroid at 33.5123, -86.8441 · click any tract to drill in

Why Smithfield Historic District scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Birmingham

6.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

5.7

State political climate

Alabama legislature & governorship

1.8

Economic stress

17.5% poverty · this tract

4.4

Supply constraint

$442 rent vs county FMR

1.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Birmingham

1.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

3.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Birmingham

5.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Birmingham

3.0

How Smithfield Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 78

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

83%Socioeconomic
66%Household composition
90%Racial/ethnic minority
52%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
25%Grade B
26%Grade C
37%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.¹

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

545Total filings over 11 yrs
7.82%Avg annual filing rate
8.6%Peak (2016)
67Filings in 2016 (latest validated)

Filings by year 2000 to 2016

Filings climbed 40% over the past 11 months.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Smithfield Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

23.8%Housing insecurity
16.6%Utility-shutoff threat
32.1%Food insecurity
25.0%SNAP enrollment
14.9%Transit barriers
11.7%No health insurance
17.7%Frequent mental distress
40.4%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Smithfield Historic District

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10. Food insecurity runs 32.1% against 17.8% nationally.

Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10. SNAP participation runs 25.0% against 15.2% nationally. 42% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Jefferson County average of 46.3%.

Against the Jefferson County average of 4.3, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.9 points. The filing record is not thin: 545 evictions over 11 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2016 at 8.6% of renter households.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Birmingham. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 7.8% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 65% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073003002

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073003002?

Census tract 01073003002 in the Smithfield Historic District neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 01073003002?

Median gross rent is $442/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073003002?

17.5% of residents in tract 01073003002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,550.

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073003002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 78th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 66th, minority 90th, housing 52th.

Is tract 01073003002 considered part of Smithfield Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073003002 fall within Smithfield Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073003002?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 545 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073003002 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.82% of renter households, peaking at 8.6% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

What share of households in tract 01073003002 struggle to pay rent?

About 23.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 01073003002 compare to Birmingham overall?

Tract 01073003002 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Birmingham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 01073003002 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 37% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham

Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Eviction Lab tract-level court records (2000-2018) and Eviction Tracking System, Princeton University. Open Data Commons Attribution license. evictionlab.org