Smithfield Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Birmingham
Tract 01073004200 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 1,334 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Census tract 01073004200 covers part of the Smithfield Historic District area of Birmingham, AL, and scores 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,334. At $676 a month, rents run 39% under what the rest of Birmingham commands.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Birmingham and the region
Centroid at 33.5007, -86.8271 · click any tract to drill in
Why Smithfield Historic District scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Smithfield Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 86
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 89%Socioeconomic
- 46%Household composition
- 93%Racial/ethnic minority
- 81%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 7%Grade B
- 5%Grade C
- 70%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 548Total filings over 11 yrs
- 7.40%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.5%Peak (2001)
- 19Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Smithfield Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 24.5%Housing insecurity
- 17.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 34.8%Food insecurity
- 28.3%SNAP enrollment
- 16.0%Transit barriers
- 13.3%No health insurance
- 17.6%Frequent mental distress
- 43.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Smithfield Historic District
Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. 27% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10.
78% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Food insecurity runs 34.8% against 17.8% nationally.
The poverty rate is 27%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10. SNAP participation runs 28.3% against 15.2% nationally.
Against the Jefferson County average of 4.3, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points. Court records carry 548 eviction filings across 11 observed years.
The worst year on record was 2001, when 11.5% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 7.4% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 01073004200
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073004200?
What is the average rent in tract 01073004200?
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073004200?
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073004200?
Is tract 01073004200 considered part of Smithfield Historic District?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073004200?
What share of households in tract 01073004200 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 01073004200 compare to Birmingham overall?
Was tract 01073004200 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham
Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.