Neighborhood · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally

Cloverdale Historic District Eviction Risk: Lower , Montgomery

Tract 01101002100 · Montgomery County, AL · pop 4,353 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Tract 01101002100 sits in the Cloverdale Historic District area of Montgomery eviction risk, AL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.6/10. It is home to 4,353 residents. Cost burden runs 60% here against 42.8% across Montgomery County.

Risk score

3.6

Lower

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 14% Owners 65%

Tract context

Occupied units1,371

Renter share35.7%

SVI overall0.82

Poverty rate16.3%

Median income$59,827

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Montgomery and the region

Centroid at 32.3357, -86.2908 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cloverdale Historic District scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Montgomery

5.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

6.6

State political climate

Alabama legislature & governorship

1.8

Economic stress

16.3% poverty · this tract

4.1

Supply constraint

$1,152 rent vs county FMR

5.9

Rent control risk

Inherited from Montgomery

1.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

3.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Montgomery

3.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Montgomery

3.0

How Cloverdale Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

86%Socioeconomic
84%Household composition
85%Racial/ethnic minority
46%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

7%Grade A
7%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.¹

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

326Total filings over 9 yrs
8.40%Avg annual filing rate
10.2%Peak (2016)
56Filings in 2016 (latest validated)

Filings by year 2001 to 2016

Filings climbed 60% over the past 9 months.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cloverdale Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

21.8%Housing insecurity
15.3%Utility-shutoff threat
28.0%Food insecurity
22.2%SNAP enrollment
13.7%Transit barriers
10.4%No health insurance
17.6%Frequent mental distress
38.3%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cloverdale Historic District

Severe burden reaches 30%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.6/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 326 filings here across 9 tracked years. Housing insecurity runs 21.8% against 14.2% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 22.2% against 15.2% nationally. The worst year on record was 2016, when 10.2% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 8.4% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #56,048 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.4/10. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

It tracks the Montgomery County average of 4.0 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 01101002100

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01101002100?

Census tract 01101002100 in the Cloverdale Historic District neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 01101002100?

Median gross rent is $1,152/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 01101002100?

16.3% of residents in tract 01101002100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,353.

How socially vulnerable is tract 01101002100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 86th, household 84th, minority 85th, housing 46th.

Is tract 01101002100 considered part of Cloverdale Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01101002100 fall within Cloverdale Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01101002100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 326 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 01101002100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.40% of renter households, peaking at 10.2% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

What share of households in tract 01101002100 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 01101002100 compare to Montgomery overall?

Tract 01101002100 scores 3.6/10, right in line with the parent city of Montgomery at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Montgomery eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 01101002100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Montgomery

Top eight tracts in Montgomery ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Eviction Lab tract-level court records (2000-2018) and Eviction Tracking System, Princeton University. Open Data Commons Attribution license. evictionlab.org