Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Census Tract · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally
Badger Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 02090001502 · Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK · pop 6,072 · 98% of tract blocks fall in Badger
Here is how census tract 02090001502, in Badger eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 3.1/10 eviction-risk score (Lower tier) across a population of 6,072. That is riskier than about 3% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 26% of renter households, a moderate level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,458 a month against an average household income of $105,273 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 21% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 16%
Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,767
Renter share21.3%
SVI overall0.40
Poverty rate4.1%
Median income$105,273
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
19
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
14
th percentile
Very Low
National
8
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Badger and the region
Centroid at 64.7678, -147.3115 · click any tract to drill in
Why Badger scores 1.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Badger
1.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Alaska legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
4.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,458 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Badger
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Badger
4.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Badger
3.3
How Badger compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 40
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 42%Socioeconomic
- 55%Household composition
- 34%Racial/ethnic minority
- 33%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.4%Housing insecurity
- 6.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.9%Food insecurity
- 7.6%SNAP enrollment
- 7.6%Transit barriers
- 9.3%No health insurance
- 16.8%Frequent mental distress
- 27.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Badger
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 4.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Badger eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Fairbanks North Star County average of 3.5 and below the Alaska statewide average of 3.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 10.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 40th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 02090001502
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 02090001502?
Census tract 02090001502 in Badger scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 02090001502?
Median gross rent is $1,458/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 02090001502?
4.1% of residents in tract 02090001502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,072.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 02090001502?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 40th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 55th, minority 34th, housing 33th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 02090001502 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 02090001502 compare to Badger overall?
Tract 02090001502 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Badger at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Badger eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Badger
Top eight tracts in Badger ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related