Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

LaLoma Ranch Eviction Risk: Lower , Glendale

Tract 04013061047 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 4,026 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 04013061047 in the LaLoma Ranch area of Glendale, AZ reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,026 residents. At $2,250 a month, rents run 47% over what the rest of Glendale commands.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 2% Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units1,257
Renter share3.1%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate1.4%
Median income$136,370

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In LaLoma Ranch
Very Low
Within parent city
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#54 of 59 tracts In Glendale
Very Low
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#618 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#1,065 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Glendale and the region

Centroid at 33.5134, -112.3503 · click any tract to drill in

Why LaLoma Ranch scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Glendale
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
1.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,250 rent vs county FMR
6.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Glendale
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Glendale
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Glendale
3.0

How LaLoma Ranch compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
LaLoma Ranch risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 061047Glendale: 3.53.5Glendaleparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 16Total filings over 3 yrs
  • 41.92%Avg annual filing rate
  • 78.1%Peak (2004)
  • 5Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040130610472001: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2002: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2003: 3 filings (29.30/100 renter HHs)2004: 8 filings (78.13/100 renter HHs)2005: 5 filings (18.32/100 renter HHs)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within LaLoma Ranch. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in LaLoma Ranch

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10.

The severe-burden share is 23%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10. SNAP participation runs 6.5% against 15.2% nationally.

The voucher gap is 15.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The filing record is not thin: 16 evictions over 3 years of observation. Against the Maricopa County average of 3.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points.

Filings peaked in 2004 at 78.1% of renter households. In a typical year about 41.9% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 3% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 1%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. 46% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013061047

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013061047?

Census tract 04013061047 in the LaLoma Ranch neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013061047?

Median gross rent is $2,250/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013061047?

1.4% of residents in tract 04013061047 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,026.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013061047?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 14th, household 19th, minority 65th, housing 7th.
Q5

Is tract 04013061047 considered part of LaLoma Ranch?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013061047 fall within LaLoma Ranch (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013061047?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 16 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 04013061047 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 41.92% of renter households, peaking at 78.1% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04013061047 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04013061047 compare to Glendale overall?

Tract 04013061047 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Glendale at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glendale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Glendale

Top eight tracts in Glendale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related