Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Amberwood Eviction Risk: Lower , Chandler

Tract 04013422222 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 2,150 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 04013422222 in the Amberwood area of Mesa, AZ reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,150 residents. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 25% Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units818
Renter share36.6%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate3.4%
Median income$115,417

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Amberwood
Very Low
Within parent city
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#93 of 133 tracts In Chandler
Low
Within county
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#805 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#1,065 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chandler and the region

Centroid at 33.3707, -111.8628 · click any tract to drill in

Why Amberwood scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chandler
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
3.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,043 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chandler
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chandler
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chandler
2.5

How Amberwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Amberwood risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 422222Chandler: 3.23.2Chandlerparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 27

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 231Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 8.51%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.4%Peak (2005)
  • 58Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040134222222001: 36 filings (6.05/100 renter HHs)2002: 29 filings (4.88/100 renter HHs)2003: 53 filings (8.91/100 renter HHs)2004: 55 filings (9.25/100 renter HHs)2005: 58 filings (13.44/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 61% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Amberwood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Amberwood

Cost burden runs 33% here against 46.0% across Maricopa County. The severe-burden share is 26%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10.

On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10. At $2,043 a month, rents run 26% over what the rest of Mesa commands.

SNAP participation runs 6.5% against 15.2% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 231 evictions over 5 years of observation.

Food insecurity runs 9.8% against 17.8% nationally. Against the Maricopa County average of 3.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points.

The worst year on record was 2005, when 13.4% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 8.5% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.4/10.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013422222

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013422222?

Census tract 04013422222 in the Amberwood neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013422222?

Median gross rent is $2,043/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013422222?

3.4% of residents in tract 04013422222 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,150.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013422222?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 42th, minority 59th, housing 34th.
Q5

Is tract 04013422222 considered part of Amberwood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013422222 fall within Amberwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013422222?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 231 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 04013422222 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.51% of renter households, peaking at 13.4% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04013422222 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04013422222 compare to Chandler overall?

Tract 04013422222 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Chandler at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chandler eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chandler

Top eight tracts in Chandler ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related