Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Amberwood Eviction Risk: Lower , Chandler

Tract 04013422219 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 3,396 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

04013422219 is a census tract in the Amberwood area of Chandler, AZ. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Cost burden runs 17% here against 46.0% across Maricopa County.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 36% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,550
Renter share42.8%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate9.8%
Median income$96,781

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Amberwood
Low
Within parent city
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#29 of 61 tracts In Chandler
Moderate
Within county
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#803 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#1,065 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chandler and the region

Centroid at 33.3533, -111.8678 · click any tract to drill in

Why Amberwood scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chandler
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
9.8% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,744 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chandler
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chandler
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chandler
2.0

How Amberwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Amberwood risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 422219Chandler: 3.23.2Chandlerparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 387Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 18.59%Avg annual filing rate
  • 36.2%Peak (2005)
  • 143Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040134222192001: 43 filings (10.00/100 renter HHs)2002: 26 filings (6.05/100 renter HHs)2003: 75 filings (17.44/100 renter HHs)2004: 100 filings (23.26/100 renter HHs)2005: 143 filings (36.20/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 233% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Amberwood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Amberwood

The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10. On the softer side, tenant-organizing strength reads 2/10.

Severe burden reaches 12%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 387 filings here across 5 tracked years. Against the Maricopa County average of 3.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points.

The worst year on record was 2005, when 36.2% of renter households were served. Average gross rent is $1,744, 8% below the Chandler average.

In a typical year about 18.6% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013422219

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013422219?

Census tract 04013422219 in the Amberwood neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013422219?

Median gross rent is $1,744/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 17% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013422219?

9.8% of residents in tract 04013422219 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,396.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013422219?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 9th, minority 52th, housing 13th.
Q5

Is tract 04013422219 considered part of Amberwood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013422219 fall within Amberwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013422219?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 387 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 04013422219 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 18.59% of renter households, peaking at 36.2% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04013422219 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04013422219 compare to Chandler overall?

Tract 04013422219 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Chandler at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chandler eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chandler

Top eight tracts in Chandler ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related