Piedmont Pines Eviction Risk: High , Oakland
Tract 06001404600 · Alameda, CA · pop 4,934 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
06001404600 is a census tract in the Piedmont Pines area of Oakland, CA. It scores 8.6/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,934. 25% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Alameda County average of 45.5%.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Oakland and the region
Centroid at 37.8199, -122.1912 · click any tract to drill in
Why Piedmont Pines scores 8.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Piedmont Pines compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 20
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 10%Socioeconomic
- 41%Household composition
- 59%Racial/ethnic minority
- 25%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 69%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.7%Housing insecurity
- 3.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.9%Food insecurity
- 5.0%SNAP enrollment
- 4.0%Transit barriers
- 3.2%No health insurance
- 12.5%Frequent mental distress
- 23.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Piedmont Pines
What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. At $2,935 a month, rents run 48% over what the rest of Oakland commands. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.7/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Severe burden reaches 15%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
SNAP participation runs 5.0% against 15.2% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 5.7% against 14.2% nationally.
Against the Alameda County average of 7.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.8 points. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Oakland. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
That is riskier than roughly 94% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 16% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.8/10. Against average income of $226,838, annual rent is just 16%.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06001404600
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001404600?
What is the average rent in tract 06001404600?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06001404600?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06001404600?
Is tract 06001404600 considered part of Piedmont Pines?
What share of households in tract 06001404600 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06001404600 compare to Oakland overall?
Was tract 06001404600 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Oakland
Top eight tracts in Oakland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.