Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,119 of 84,120 nationally

Trestle Glen Eviction Risk: High , Oakland

Tract 06001405100 · Alameda, CA · pop 4,508 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

06001405100 is a census tract in the Trestle Glen area of Oakland, CA. It scores 9/10 for landlords. It is home to 4,508 residents. 10% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Alameda County average of 45.5%.

Risk score
9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 5% Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units1,694
Renter share5.4%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate8.7%
Median income$250,001

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Trestle Glen
Moderate
Within parent city
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#94 of 116 tracts In Oakland
Very Low
Within county
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#122 of 378 tracts In Alameda
Elevated
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#1,820 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Oakland and the region

Centroid at 37.8114, -122.2322 · click any tract to drill in

Why Trestle Glen scores 9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Oakland
9.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.7% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Oakland
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Oakland
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Oakland
9.5

How Trestle Glen compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Trestle Glen risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.09.0This tracttract 405100Oakland: 9.69.6Oaklandparent cityCounty: 7.87.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Trestle Glen

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.7/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

Against the Alameda County average of 7.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.2 points. 10% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Housing insecurity runs 6.1% against 14.2% nationally.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Oakland. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 95th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 5% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06001405100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001405100?

Census tract 06001405100 in the Trestle Glen neighborhood scores 9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 06001405100?

8.7% of residents in tract 06001405100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,508.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 06001405100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 0th, household 26th, minority 51th, housing 2th.
Q4

Is tract 06001405100 considered part of Trestle Glen?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001405100 fall within Trestle Glen (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q5

What share of households in tract 06001405100 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06001405100 compare to Oakland overall?

Tract 06001405100 scores 9/10, lower than the parent city of Oakland at 9.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Oakland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 06001405100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Oakland

Top eight tracts in Oakland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related