Tract 06037143902 ·
Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,053 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
With a score of 8.4/10, tract 06037143902 in the Silver Triangle area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17%Stable renters 26%Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,415
Renter share42.9%
SVI overall0.33
Poverty rate10.3%
Median income$155,045
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#8 of 8 tracts In Silver Triangle
Very Low
Within parent city
0th percentile
#1,115 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within county
43th percentile
#1,433 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within state
70th percentile
#2,744 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.1358, -118.4214 · click any tract to drill in
Why Silver Triangle scores 8.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.3% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$2,514 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0
How Silver Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 33
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
33%Socioeconomic
41%Household composition
52%Racial/ethnic minority
30%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
8%Grade A
4%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Silver Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
7.7%Housing insecurity
3.8%Utility-shutoff threat
7.6%Food insecurity
7.0%SNAP enrollment
5.0%Transit barriers
3.7%No health insurance
14.6%Frequent mental distress
23.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Silver Triangle
Severe burden reaches 32%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Cost burden runs 39% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Average gross rent is $2,514, 30% above the Los Angeles average.
Food insecurity runs 7.6% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 7.0% against 15.2% nationally.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 93rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037143902
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037143902?
Census tract 06037143902 in the Silver Triangle neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037143902?
Median gross rent is $2,514/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037143902?
10.3% of residents in tract 06037143902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,053.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037143902?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 33th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 41th, minority 52th, housing 30th.
Q5
Is tract 06037143902 considered part of Silver Triangle?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037143902 fall within Silver Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037143902 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037143902 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Tract 06037143902 scores 8.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06037143902 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.