Glassell Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037186203 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,991 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Census tract 06037186203 covers part of the Glassell Park area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 8.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,991 residents. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.1150, -118.2153 · click any tract to drill in
Why Glassell Park scores 8.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Glassell Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 44
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 54%Socioeconomic
- 48%Household composition
- 73%Racial/ethnic minority
- 19%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 61%Grade B
- 30%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Glassell Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.8%Housing insecurity
- 5.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.9%Food insecurity
- 10.8%SNAP enrollment
- 6.8%Transit barriers
- 7.5%No health insurance
- 14.5%Frequent mental distress
- 25.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Glassell Park
At $2,983 a month, rents run 54% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands. Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 40% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Severe burden reaches 16%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The voucher gap is 13.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 25% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.9/10.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06037186203
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037186203?
What is the average rent in tract 06037186203?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037186203?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037186203?
Is tract 06037186203 considered part of Glassell Park?
What share of households in tract 06037186203 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037186203 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037186203 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.