Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

Glassell Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037181600 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,438 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

Tract 06037181600 sits in the Glassell Park area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8.4/10. It is home to 4,438 residents. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 26% Owners 46%
Tract context
Occupied units1,088
Renter share54.6%
SVI overall0.52
Poverty rate4.7%
Median income$109,688

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 11 tracts In Glassell Park
Very Low
Within parent city
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#1,006 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within county
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#1,436 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within state
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#2,744 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.1297, -118.2097 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glassell Park scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.7% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,735 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Glassell Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glassell Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.48.4This tracttract 181600Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 52

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glassell Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glassell Park

Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

10% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. SNAP participation runs 8.0% against 15.2% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,735, 10% below the Los Angeles average.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.7/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Rent takes 30% or more of income for about half of renters.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037181600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037181600?

Census tract 06037181600 in the Glassell Park neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037181600?

Median gross rent is $1,735/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037181600?

4.7% of residents in tract 06037181600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,438.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037181600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 52th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 12th, minority 78th, housing 85th.
Q5

Is tract 06037181600 considered part of Glassell Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037181600 fall within Glassell Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037181600 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037181600 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037181600 scores 8.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037181600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related