Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,339 of 84,120 nationally

Virgil Village Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037195803 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,351 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Tract 06037195803 sits in the Virgil Village area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.7/10. It is home to 2,351 residents. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.7
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 37% Stable renters 39% Owners 24%
Tract context
Occupied units1,081
Renter share76.1%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate12.6%
Median income$89,962

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 9 tracts In Virgil Village
Low
Within parent city
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#662 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within county
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#793 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#1,125 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0818, -118.2769 · click any tract to drill in

Why Virgil Village scores 9.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.6% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$2,021 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Virgil Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Virgil Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.79.7This tracttract 195803Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 77

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Virgil Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Virgil Village

Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

24% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. This is renter territory: 76% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. It sits 1.3 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

Cost burden runs 49% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 97% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.2 points hotter.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $2,021, close to the Los Angeles average.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037195803

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037195803?

Census tract 06037195803 in the Virgil Village neighborhood scores 9.7/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037195803?

Median gross rent is $2,021/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037195803?

12.6% of residents in tract 06037195803 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,351.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037195803?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 75th, household 27th, minority 69th, housing 90th.
Q5

Is tract 06037195803 considered part of Virgil Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037195803 fall within Virgil Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037195803 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037195803 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037195803 scores 9.7/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037195803 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 50% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related