Walker Eviction Risk: High , Bell
Tract 06037534404 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,244 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037534404 in the Walker area of Cudahy, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,244 residents. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.9/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Bell and the region
Centroid at 33.9663, -118.1906 · click any tract to drill in
Why Walker scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Walker compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 93
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 96%Socioeconomic
- 64%Household composition
- 97%Racial/ethnic minority
- 83%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 99%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Walker. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 31.6%Housing insecurity
- 13.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 39.6%Food insecurity
- 34.8%SNAP enrollment
- 18.0%Transit barriers
- 26.1%No health insurance
- 19.8%Frequent mental distress
- 41.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Walker
26% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10. Housing insecurity runs 31.6% against 14.2% nationally.
73% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Sitting well above the midpoint, housing-court posture reads 8.7/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 26.1% against 11.3% nationally.
45% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
Average gross rent is $1,407, 18% below the Cudahy average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.3/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
Annual rent works out to 31% of average household income of $54,063.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037534404
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037534404?
What is the average rent in tract 06037534404?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037534404?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037534404?
Is tract 06037534404 considered part of Walker?
What share of households in tract 06037534404 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037534404 compare to Bell overall?
Was tract 06037534404 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Bell
Top eight tracts in Bell ranked by composite eviction-risk score.