Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally
Walker Eviction Risk: High , Bell
Tract 06037534406 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,348 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Census tract 06037534406 covers part of the Walker area of Cudahy, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,348. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.9/10.
Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 52%
Stable renters 45%
Owners 3%
Tract context
Occupied units1,139
Renter share96.8%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate21.4%
Median income$50,653
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
40
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
74
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
100
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bell and the region
Centroid at 33.9655, -118.1748 · click any tract to drill in
Why Walker scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Bell
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
21.4% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$1,578 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bell
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bell
9.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bell
8.7
How Walker compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 93
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 99%Socioeconomic
- 69%Household composition
- 100%Racial/ethnic minority
- 64%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Walker. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 34.1%Housing insecurity
- 15.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 42.6%Food insecurity
- 38.5%SNAP enrollment
- 19.8%Transit barriers
- 26.8%No health insurance
- 20.7%Frequent mental distress
- 42.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Walker
Food insecurity runs 42.6% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 38.5% against 15.2% nationally. This is renter territory: 97% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.
Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10. Annualized rent equals 37% of average household income of $50,653, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. The severe-burden share is 23%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
On the high side, housing-court posture reads 8.7/10. It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. The poverty rate is 21%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 9.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037534406
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037534406?
Census tract 06037534406 in the Walker neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037534406?
Median gross rent is $1,578/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037534406?
21.4% of residents in tract 06037534406 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,348.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037534406?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 69th, minority 100th, housing 64th.
Q5
Is tract 06037534406 considered part of Walker?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037534406 fall within Walker (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037534406 struggle to pay rent?
About 34.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037534406 compare to Bell overall?
Tract 06037534406 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of Bell at 9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bell; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Bell
Top eight tracts in Bell ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related