Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,988 of 84,120 nationally

Upper Land Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Sacramento

Tract 06067002200 · Sacramento, CA · pop 5,278 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

06067002200 is a census tract in the Upper Land Park area of Sacramento, CA. It scores 7.2/10 for landlords. Population here is 5,278. Severe burden reaches 33%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
7.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 22% Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units2,319
Renter share45.3%
SVI overall0.52
Poverty rate14.2%
Median income$124,194

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Upper Land Park
Moderate
Within parent city
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#101 of 131 tracts In Sacramento
Low
Within county
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#176 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Moderate
Within state
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#4,881 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sacramento and the region

Centroid at 38.5601, -121.5080 · click any tract to drill in

Why Upper Land Park scores 7.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.2% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$1,609 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sacramento
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sacramento
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0

How Upper Land Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Upper Land Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.27.2This tracttract 002200Sacramento: 7.97.9Sacramentoparent cityCounty: 7.17.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 52

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Upper Land Park

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 8.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10.

Running hot, local political climate reads 8/10. At $1,609 a month, rents run 10% under what the rest of Sacramento commands.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Sacramento. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #11,988 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Social vulnerability reads 5.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $124,194, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

roughly one in two of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the Sacramento County average of 7.1 closely. 45% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067002200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067002200?

Census tract 06067002200 in the Upper Land Park neighborhood scores 7.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067002200?

Median gross rent is $1,609/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067002200?

14.2% of residents in tract 06067002200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,278.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067002200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 52th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 55th, minority 76th, housing 25th.
Q5

Is tract 06067002200 considered part of Upper Land Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067002200 fall within Upper Land Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06067002200 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06067002200 compare to Sacramento overall?

Tract 06067002200 scores 7.2/10, lower than the parent city of Sacramento at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06067002200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 8% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento

Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related