Skip to content
Neighborhood · Sacramento, CA

Upper Land Park Eviction Risk: Elevated

1 census tracts · pop 5,278 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 7.2/10 · range 7.2–7.2

Upper Land Park maps to a single census tract in Sacramento, CA, population 5,278. That produces an Eviction Risk Score of 7.2/10, Elevated tier. Against a Sacramento baseline of 32.8%, 51% of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line.

The severe-burden share is 33%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay. The strongest single driver of the headline number is rent-regulation exposure at 8.5/10.

On the high side is eviction-process difficulty at 8.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint is housing-court posture at 8/10.

At $1,609 a month, rents sit 10% under what the rest of Sacramento commands. That places it #26 of 34 neighborhoods in Sacramento. For a like-for-like read, Northlake and McKinley Village score within a fraction of it.

Against average income of $124,194, annual rent is only 16%, a wide affordability cushion. 45% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Because the boundary contains one tract, 7.2/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.

Risk score
7.2
Elevated
1 tracts · population-weighted
Upper Land Park vs Sacramento How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
50.9% +55%
Sacramento: 32.8%
Average gross rent
$1,609 -10%
Sacramento: $1,779
Average HH income
$124,194 +48%
Sacramento: $83,753
Poverty rate
14.2% -1%
Sacramento: 14.4%
Renter share
45.3% -6%
Sacramento: 48.3%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Upper Land Park and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 7.2–7.2

Why Upper Land Park scores 7.2

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 6.8–6.8 across tracts
6.8
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 6.3–6.3 across tracts
6.3
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 8.0–8.0 across tracts
8.0
Rent control risk
51% of income on rent · Range 8.5–8.5 across tracts
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 8.5–8.5 across tracts
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
45% renter households · Range 7.5–7.5 across tracts
7.5
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 8.0–8.0 across tracts
8.0
Economic stress
14.2% below poverty line · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 2.3–2.3 across tracts
2.3
Risk score comparison

Upper Land Park vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Upper Land Park score vs. parent city, state, U.S.Upper Land Park: 7.27.2Upper Land ParkNeighborhoodParent city: 7.97.9Parent cityhost cityState: 7.67.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.15.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Upper Land Park

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
06067002200 7.2 5,278 51% $1,609
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 52

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 59%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 55%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 76%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 26%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Upper Land Park

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Upper Land Park

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Upper Land Park?

Upper Land Park scores 7.2/10 (Elevated tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Upper Land Park compare to Sacramento overall?

Upper Land Park scores 0.7 points lower than Sacramento overall (7.9/10). Renters spend 51% of income on rent vs 33% citywide. Average rent: $1,609 vs $1,779.
Q3

What is the average rent in Upper Land Park?

Average gross rent in Upper Land Park is $1,609/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Upper Land Park residents are renters?

45% of Upper Land Park households are renter-occupied (vs 48% in Sacramento). The neighborhood has 5,278 residents.
Q5

Is Upper Land Park a high social-vulnerability area?

Upper Land Park sits in the 52nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (moderately vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Upper Land Park for landlords?

Upper Land Park carries a elevated-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (7.2/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Sacramento as a whole (7.9/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Upper Land Park?

Upper Land Park has 5,257 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (38.9%), Hispanic / Latino (30.4%), Other / Multiracial (18.7%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Upper Land Park

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Sacramento

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Upper Land Park.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further