Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,653 of 84,120 nationally

Carleton Tract Eviction Risk: Elevated , Sacramento

Tract 06067003501 · Sacramento, CA · pop 2,447 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 06067003501 sits in the Carleton Tract area of Sacramento eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.9/10. Population here is 2,447. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1/10.

Risk score
7.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 16% Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units1,391
Renter share28.9%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate12.9%
Median income$90,625

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Carleton Tract
Very Low
Within parent city
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#80 of 131 tracts In Sacramento
Low
Within county
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#127 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Elevated
Within state
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#3,732 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sacramento and the region

Centroid at 38.5332, -121.4883 · click any tract to drill in

Why Carleton Tract scores 7.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.9% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,319 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sacramento
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sacramento
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0

How Carleton Tract compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Carleton Tract risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.97.9This tracttract 003501Sacramento: 7.97.9Sacramentoparent cityCounty: 7.17.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 42

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Carleton Tract. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Carleton Tract

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. At $1,319 a month, rents run 26% under what the rest of Sacramento commands. Cost burden runs 44% here against 50.2% across Sacramento County.

It sits 0.8 points above the Sacramento County average of 7.1. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Sacramento. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

That is riskier than roughly 90% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 4.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Against average income of $90,625, annual rent is just 17%. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

29% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067003501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067003501?

Census tract 06067003501 in the Carleton Tract neighborhood scores 7.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067003501?

Median gross rent is $1,319/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067003501?

12.9% of residents in tract 06067003501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,447.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067003501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 39th, minority 71th, housing 14th.
Q5

Is tract 06067003501 considered part of Carleton Tract?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067003501 fall within Carleton Tract (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06067003501 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06067003501 compare to Sacramento overall?

Tract 06067003501 scores 7.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Sacramento at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06067003501 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento

Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related