Parkmerced Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. The poverty rate is 44%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Against San Francisco County at 37.3%, 53% of renters here are cost-burdened. This is renter territory: 99% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.

Annualized rent equals 46% of average household income of $68,250, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Food insecurity runs 26.8% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 24.1% against 15.2% nationally.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 7.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely. Average gross rent is $2,589, close to the San Francisco average.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.