Within neighborhood
33
th percentile
Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,119 of 84,120 nationally
Seven Trees Eviction Risk: High , San Jose
Tract 06085503207 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 3,589 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
With a score of 9/10, tract 06085503207 in the Seven Trees area of San Jose, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. 37% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 6%
Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units922
Renter share15.9%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate8.9%
Median income$129,079
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
53
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
74
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
80
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across San Jose and the region
Centroid at 37.2945, -121.8155 · click any tract to drill in
Why Seven Trees scores 9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.9% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$3,341 rent vs county FMR
4.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Jose
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
How Seven Trees compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 71
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 54%Socioeconomic
- 93%Household composition
- 93%Racial/ethnic minority
- 42%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Seven Trees. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.3%Housing insecurity
- 4.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.3%Food insecurity
- 9.6%SNAP enrollment
- 7.0%Transit barriers
- 6.7%No health insurance
- 13.0%Frequent mental distress
- 24.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Seven Trees
Cost burden runs 61% here against 43.5% across Santa Clara County. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9/10.
On the softer side, court filing pressure reads 1.3/10. Average gross rent is $3,341, 25% above the San Jose average. It sits 1.0 points above the Santa Clara County average of 8.0.
On the national scale it lands near the 95th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 16% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
Annual rent works out to 31% of average household income of $129,079.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06085503207
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085503207?
Census tract 06085503207 in the Seven Trees neighborhood scores 9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06085503207?
Median gross rent is $3,341/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06085503207?
8.9% of residents in tract 06085503207 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,589.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06085503207?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 93th, minority 93th, housing 42th.
Q5
Is tract 06085503207 considered part of Seven Trees?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085503207 fall within Seven Trees (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06085503207 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06085503207 compare to San Jose overall?
Tract 06085503207 scores 9/10, right in line with the parent city of San Jose at 9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Jose eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in San Jose
Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Communications Hill
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Spartan Keyes
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Alum Rock
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Naglee Park
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Notting Hill - Royal Crest
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Spartan Keyes
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Naglee Park
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Meadowfair
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Related