Neighborhood · Ranked #3,427 of 84,120 nationally

Mountain Shadows Eviction Risk: Elevated , Redding

Tract 06089010704 · Shasta, CA · pop 4,022 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

The Mountain Shadows area of Redding anchors census tract 06089010704, which lands at $1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 76th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

50% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,335 a month against an average household income of $54,288 a year, roughly 30% of income at the averages. Renters make up 55% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score

7.4

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 28% Owners 44%

Tract context

Occupied units1,759

Renter share55.5%

SVI overall0.90

Poverty rate22.1%

Median income$54,288

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Redding and the region

Centroid at 40.6147, -122.3987 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mountain Shadows scores 7.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Redding

4.0

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

3.3

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

22.1% poverty · this tract

5.5

Supply constraint

$1,335 rent vs county FMR

3.3

Rent control risk

Inherited from Redding

6.7

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.0

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Redding

8.7

Housing court bias

Inherited from Redding

6.5

How Mountain Shadows compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

85%Socioeconomic
73%Household composition
44%Racial/ethnic minority
97%Housing & transportation

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

16.1%Housing insecurity
10.3%Utility-shutoff threat
22.1%Food insecurity
25.5%SNAP enrollment
12.5%Transit barriers
9.9%No health insurance
21.7%Frequent mental distress
41.7%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mountain Shadows

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Redding, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Shasta County average of 5.4 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 90th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 16.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06089010704

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06089010704?

Census tract 06089010704 in the Mountain Shadows neighborhood scores 7.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06089010704?

Median gross rent is $1,335/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06089010704?

22.1% of residents in tract 06089010704 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,022.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06089010704?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 73th, minority 44th, housing 97th.

Is tract 06089010704 considered part of Mountain Shadows?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06089010704 fall within Mountain Shadows (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06089010704 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06089010704 compare to Redding overall?

Tract 06089010704 scores 7.4/10, higher than the parent city of Redding at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redding; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redding

Top eight tracts in Redding ranked by composite eviction-risk score.