Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Twin Lakes Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 08001009502 · Adams County, CO · pop 5,214 · 51% of tract blocks fall in Twin Lakes

Twin Lakes anchors census tract 08001009502, which lands at $1/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 76% of US census tracts.

49% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,225 a month while the average household earns $118,214 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 15% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 7% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,914
Renter share14.7%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate7.2%
Median income$118,214

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Twin Lakes
Very Low
Within county
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#49 of 107 tracts In Adams County
Moderate
Within state
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#842 of 1,447 tracts In Colorado
Moderate
National
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#63,481 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Twin Lakes and the region

Centroid at 39.8201, -105.0189 · click any tract to drill in

Why Twin Lakes scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Twin Lakes
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
7.2% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$2,225 rent vs county FMR
5.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Twin Lakes
4.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Twin Lakes
2.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Twin Lakes
4.0

How Twin Lakes compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Twin Lakes risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 009502Twin Lakes: 4.44.4Twin Lakesparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.23.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 350Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 26.08%Avg annual filing rate
  • 45.3%Peak (2006)
  • 70Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 080010095022001: 59 filings (21.45/100 renter HHs)2004: 83 filings (30.18/100 renter HHs)2006: 121 filings (45.32/100 renter HHs)2016: 17 filings (6.54/100 renter HHs)2017: 70 filings (26.92/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 19% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Twin Lakes

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 5.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Twin Lakes, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Adams County average of 6.3 and in line with the Colorado statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 36th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 350 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 26.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 45.3% of renter households in 2006.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 08001009502

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08001009502?

Census tract 08001009502 in Twin Lakes scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 08001009502?

Median gross rent is $2,225/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 08001009502?

7.2% of residents in tract 08001009502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,214.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 08001009502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 27th, minority 75th, housing 24th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 08001009502?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 350 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 08001009502 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 26.08% of renter households, peaking at 45.3% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 08001009502 compare to Twin Lakes overall?

Tract 08001009502 scores 2.7/10, lower than the parent city of Twin Lakes at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Twin Lakes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Twin Lakes

Top eight tracts in Twin Lakes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related