Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #54,934 of 84,120 nationally

Twin Lakes Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 08001009553 · Adams County, CO · pop 3,453 · 72% of tract blocks fall in Twin Lakes

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 08001009553 (Twin Lakes, Colorado) comes in at 5.8/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 69% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 68% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,464 monthly, set against $90,851 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 25% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 8% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,391
Renter share25.0%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate7.5%
Median income$90,851

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Twin Lakes
Very High
Within county
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#33 of 107 tracts In Adams County
Elevated
Within state
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#700 of 1,447 tracts In Colorado
Moderate
National
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#54,934 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Twin Lakes and the region

Centroid at 39.8110, -104.9913 · click any tract to drill in

Why Twin Lakes scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Twin Lakes
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
7.5% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,464 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Twin Lakes
4.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Twin Lakes
2.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Twin Lakes
4.0

How Twin Lakes compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Twin Lakes risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.23.2This tracttract 009553Twin Lakes: 4.44.4Twin Lakesparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.23.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 64

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 139Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 7.09%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.3%Peak (2006)
  • 15Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 080010095532001: 20 filings (4.61/100 renter HHs)2004: 31 filings (7.15/100 renter HHs)2006: 39 filings (13.26/100 renter HHs)2016: 34 filings (7.25/100 renter HHs)2017: 15 filings (3.20/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 25% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Twin Lakes

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 4.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Twin Lakes, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Adams County average of 6.3 and in line with the Colorado statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 64th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 139 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 7.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 13.3% of renter households in 2006.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 08001009553

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08001009553?

Census tract 08001009553 in Twin Lakes scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 08001009553?

Median gross rent is $1,464/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 08001009553?

7.5% of residents in tract 08001009553 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,453.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 08001009553?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 65th, minority 74th, housing 46th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 08001009553?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 139 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 08001009553 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.09% of renter households, peaking at 13.3% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 08001009553 compare to Twin Lakes overall?

Tract 08001009553 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Twin Lakes at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Twin Lakes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Twin Lakes

Top eight tracts in Twin Lakes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related