Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Chaddsford Eviction Risk: Lower , Aurora

Tract 08005081500 · Arapahoe County, CO · pop 2,772 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 08005081500 covers the Chaddsford area of Aurora, home to 2,772 residents. For landlords it grades $1/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than roughly 76% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

43% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 36% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,636 a month against an average household income of $48,829 a year, roughly 40% of income at the averages. Renters make up 10% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 6% Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units2,165
Renter share9.9%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate4.9%
Median income$48,829

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 6 tracts In Chaddsford
Moderate
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#37 of 90 tracts In Aurora
Elevated
Within county
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#41 of 161 tracts In Arapahoe County
High
Within state
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#543 of 1,447 tracts In Colorado
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Aurora and the region

Centroid at 39.6625, -104.8274 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chaddsford scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Aurora
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
4.9% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,636 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Aurora
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Aurora
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Aurora
5.0

How Chaddsford compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chaddsford risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 081500Aurora: 5.45.4Auroraparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.23.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 14Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 0.63%Avg annual filing rate
  • 0.9%Peak (2011)
  • 2Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 080050815002010: 2 filings (0.55/100 renter HHs)2011: 4 filings (0.89/100 renter HHs)2012: 2 filings (0.45/100 renter HHs)2016: 4 filings (0.83/100 renter HHs)2017: 2 filings (0.41/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Chaddsford. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chaddsford

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Aurora eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Arapahoe County average of 6.3 and in line with the Colorado statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 23rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 14 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 0.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 0.9% of renter households in 2011.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 08005081500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08005081500?

Census tract 08005081500 in the Chaddsford neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 08005081500?

Median gross rent is $1,636/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 08005081500?

4.9% of residents in tract 08005081500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,772.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 08005081500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 22th, household 50th, minority 14th, housing 27th.
Q5

Is tract 08005081500 considered part of Chaddsford?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 08005081500 fall within Chaddsford (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 08005081500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 14 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 08005081500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.63% of renter households, peaking at 0.9% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 08005081500 compare to Aurora overall?

Tract 08005081500 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of Aurora at 5.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Aurora eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Aurora

Top eight tracts in Aurora ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related