Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally

Trails at Coal Creek Eviction Risk: Lower , Lafayette

Tract 08013060900 · Boulder County, CO · pop 5,615 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

For landlords sizing up Trails at Coal Creek in Lafayette, census tract 08013060900 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 5.6/10. That is riskier than about 62% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 50% of renter households, a severe level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,151 monthly, set against $118,472 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 23% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 12% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units2,232
Renter share23.3%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate4.5%
Median income$118,472

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Trails at Coal Creek
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 7 tracts In Lafayette
Moderate
Within county
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#63 of 78 tracts In Boulder County
Very Low
Within state
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#1,213 of 1,447 tracts In Colorado
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lafayette and the region

Centroid at 39.9743, -105.1070 · click any tract to drill in

Why Trails at Coal Creek scores 1.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lafayette
6.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.8
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
4.5% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$2,151 rent vs county FMR
5.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lafayette
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lafayette
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lafayette
5.6

How Trails at Coal Creek compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Trails at Coal Creek risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.51.5This tracttract 060900Lafayette: 4.54.5Lafayetteparent cityCounty: 3.43.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.23.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 22

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 8Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 2.09%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.1%Peak (2002)
  • 8Filings in 2002 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Trails at Coal Creek. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Trails at Coal Creek

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lafayette eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Boulder County average of 5.8 and in line with the Colorado statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 22nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 8 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 2.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.1% of renter households in 2002.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 08013060900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08013060900?

Census tract 08013060900 in the Trails at Coal Creek neighborhood scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 08013060900?

Median gross rent is $2,151/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 08013060900?

4.5% of residents in tract 08013060900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,615.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 08013060900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 18th, minority 39th, housing 41th.
Q5

Is tract 08013060900 considered part of Trails at Coal Creek?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 08013060900 fall within Trails at Coal Creek (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 08013060900?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 8 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 08013060900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.09% of renter households, peaking at 2.1% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 08013060900 compare to Lafayette overall?

Tract 08013060900 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Lafayette at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lafayette eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lafayette

Top eight tracts in Lafayette ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related