Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,153 of 84,120 nationally
River Rock Cohousing Eviction Risk: Elevated , Fort Collins
Tract 08069000401 · Larimer County, CO · pop 2,073 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 08069000401 covers part of the River Rock Cohousing area of Fort Collins, CO, and scores 7.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. The severe-burden share is 33%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
7.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30%
Stable renters 26%
Owners 44%
Tract context
Occupied units896
Renter share55.5%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate23.3%
Median income$79,113
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
91
th percentile
Very High
Within county
85
th percentile
High
Within state
94
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fort Collins and the region
Centroid at 40.5928, -105.1052 · click any tract to drill in
Why River Rock Cohousing scores 7.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fort Collins
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
23.3% poverty · this tract
5.8
Supply constraint
$1,544 rent vs county FMR
4.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Collins
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Collins
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Collins
5.5
How River Rock Cohousing compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 36
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 77%Socioeconomic
- 3%Household composition
- 36%Racial/ethnic minority
- 30%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 16Total filings over 1 yrs
- 3.74%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.7%Peak (2010)
- 16Filings in 2010 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within River Rock Cohousing. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in River Rock Cohousing
Against the Larimer County average of 5.3, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points. The dominant input is local political climate at 7.5/10. 53% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Larimer County average of 46.1%.
The poverty rate is 23%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. The filing record is not thin: 16 evictions over 1 years of observation.
Filings peaked in 2010 at 3.7% of renter households. Average gross rent is $1,544, 9% below the Fort Collins average.
In a typical year about 3.7% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #11,153 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Statute speed, court posture and rent-regulation exposure are inherited from Fort Collins eviction risk rather than measured on these blocks; the economic and supply components are the tract-level part of the score. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 08069000401
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08069000401?
Census tract 08069000401 in the River Rock Cohousing neighborhood scores 7.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 08069000401?
Median gross rent is $1,544/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 08069000401?
23.3% of residents in tract 08069000401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,073.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 08069000401?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 77th, household 3th, minority 36th, housing 30th.
Q5
Is tract 08069000401 considered part of River Rock Cohousing?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 08069000401 fall within River Rock Cohousing (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 08069000401?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 16 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 08069000401 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.74% of renter households, peaking at 3.7% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
How does tract 08069000401 compare to Fort Collins overall?
Tract 08069000401 scores 7.3/10, higher than the parent city of Fort Collins at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Collins eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fort Collins
Top eight tracts in Fort Collins ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CO
Lexington Green
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CO
Bella Vira
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CO
Bella Vira
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CO
Woodwest
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CO
Lexington Green
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CO
Woodwest
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CO
Parkwood
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CO
Parkwood
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Related
Explore the geography around tract 08069000401
Parent city ↑
Fort Collins
5.9 / 10
Parent county ↑
Larimer County
Parent state ↑
Colorado
Sibling tract →
River Rock Cohousing
7.3 / 10
Sibling tract →
River Rock Cohousing
7.3 / 10
Sibling tract →
River Rock Cohousing
7.3 / 10
Methodology
How the score is built
Interactive map
Explore all 84k tracts