Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #17,132 of 84,120 nationally

Ansley Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Egypt Lake-Leto

Tract 12057011806 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 2,657 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 12057011806 covers part of the Ansley Park area of Egypt Lake-Leto, FL, and scores 6.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,657. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.3/10.

Risk score
6.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46% Stable renters 33% Owners 21%
Tract context
Occupied units1,263
Renter share78.3%
SVI overall0.84
Poverty rate23.2%
Median income$40,670

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Ansley Park
Very High
Within parent city
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#4 of 9 tracts In Egypt Lake-Leto
Elevated
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Very High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#108 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Egypt Lake-Leto and the region

Centroid at 28.0264, -82.5143 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ansley Park scores 6.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
23.2% poverty · this tract
5.8
Supply constraint
$1,189 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
8.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
7.8

How Ansley Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ansley Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.2This tracttract 0118064.8Egypt Lake-Letoparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 84

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 278Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.22×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Ansley Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ansley Park

Adults with no health insurance runs 30.6% against 11.3% nationally. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10. This is renter territory: 78% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Against the Hillsborough County average of 4.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points. Set annual rent against average income of $40,670 and the ratio lands at 35%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

The poverty rate is 23%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Against Hillsborough County at 51.5%, 58% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Average gross rent is $1,189, 20% below the Egypt Lake-Leto average. Nationally it ranks #17,132 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the FL average is 4.1, so this tract runs 2.1 points hotter.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057011806

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057011806?

Census tract 12057011806 in the Ansley Park neighborhood scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057011806?

Median gross rent is $1,189/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057011806?

23.2% of residents in tract 12057011806 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,657.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057011806?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 84th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 62th, minority 89th, housing 52th.
Q5

Is tract 12057011806 considered part of Ansley Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057011806 fall within Ansley Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 12057011806 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.22× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 12057011806 compare to Egypt Lake-Leto overall?

Tract 12057011806 scores 6.2/10, higher than the parent city of Egypt Lake-Leto at 4.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Egypt Lake-Leto

Top eight tracts in Egypt Lake-Leto ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related