Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #17,132 of 84,120 nationally

Ansley Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Egypt Lake-Leto

Tract 12057011908 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 2,423 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Tract 12057011908 sits in the Ansley Park area of Egypt Lake-Leto, FL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.2/10. It is home to 2,423 residents. Severe burden reaches 52%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
6.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 69% Stable renters 30% Owners 1%
Tract context
Occupied units1,099
Renter share99.0%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate26.1%
Median income$34,583

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Ansley Park
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9 tracts In Egypt Lake-Leto
Very High
Within county
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Very High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#108 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Egypt Lake-Leto and the region

Centroid at 28.0272, -82.5027 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ansley Park scores 6.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
26.1% poverty · this tract
6.5
Supply constraint
$1,425 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
8.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto
7.8

How Ansley Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ansley Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.2This tracttract 0119084.8Egypt Lake-Letoparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 408Total filings 2020-21
  • 5.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 6.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.87×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Ansley Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ansley Park

Cost burden runs 70% here against 51.5% across Hillsborough County. Set annual rent against average income of $34,583 and the ratio lands at 49%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

This is renter territory: 99% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.3/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 31.8% against 11.3% nationally.

Against the Hillsborough County average of 4.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.4/10.

The poverty rate is 26%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the national scale it lands near the 80th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.9/10.

Statewide the FL average is 4.1, so this tract runs 2.1 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057011908

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057011908?

Census tract 12057011908 in the Ansley Park neighborhood scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057011908?

Median gross rent is $1,425/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 70% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057011908?

26.1% of residents in tract 12057011908 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,423.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057011908?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 97th, minority 84th, housing 85th.
Q5

Is tract 12057011908 considered part of Ansley Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057011908 fall within Ansley Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 12057011908 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.87× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 12057011908 compare to Egypt Lake-Leto overall?

Tract 12057011908 scores 6.2/10, higher than the parent city of Egypt Lake-Leto at 4.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Egypt Lake-Leto; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Egypt Lake-Leto

Top eight tracts in Egypt Lake-Leto ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related