Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #37,882 of 84,120 nationally

Largo Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 12103025207 · Pinellas, FL · pop 6,932 · 63% of tract blocks fall in Largo

Census tract 12103025207 covers part of Largo, FL, and scores 4.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 6,932. Against Pinellas County at 53.4%, 71% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 5% Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units2,883
Renter share18.3%
SVI overall0.84
Poverty rate14.3%
Median income$62,285

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#12 of 31 tracts In Largo
Elevated
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#56 of 273 tracts In Pinellas
High
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#1,428 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
National
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#37,882 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Largo and the region

Centroid at 27.8975, -82.8146 · click any tract to drill in

Why Largo scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Largo
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
14.3% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,589 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Largo
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Largo
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Largo
6.9

How Largo compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Largo risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.7This tracttract 0252074.0Largoparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 84

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 821Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 6.66%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.9%Peak (2000)
  • 43Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 12103025207
Filings dropped 34% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 141Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.57×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Largo

Pulling hardest the other way is state political climate at 1.5/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.6/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.

The severe-burden share is 14%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. It sits 0.9 points above the Pinellas County average of 3.8.

The filing record is not thin: 821 evictions over 18 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2000, when 10.9% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 6.7% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 55% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 18% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

Social vulnerability reads 8.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 12103025207

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12103025207?

Census tract 12103025207 in Largo scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12103025207?

Median gross rent is $1,589/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 71% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12103025207?

14.3% of residents in tract 12103025207 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,932.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12103025207?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 84th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 92th, minority 53th, housing 62th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12103025207?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 821 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 12103025207 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.66% of renter households, peaking at 10.9% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 12103025207 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.57× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 12103025207 compare to Largo overall?

Tract 12103025207 scores 4.7/10, higher than the parent city of Largo at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Largo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Largo

Top eight tracts in Largo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related