Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #45,641 of 84,120 nationally

Largo Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 12103025207 · Pinellas, FL · pop 6,932 · 63% of tract blocks fall in Largo

Census tract 12103025207 covers Largo, home to 6,932 residents. For landlords it grades 5.5/10, a moderate reading. On the national scale it ranks #35,485 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

71% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,589 a month while the average household earns $62,285 a year, roughly 31% of income at the averages. About 18% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 5% Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units2,883
Renter share18.3%
SVI overall0.84
Poverty rate14.3%
Median income$62,285

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 31 tracts In Largo
Elevated
Within county
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#83 of 273 tracts In Pinellas
Elevated
Within state
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#1,588 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
National
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#45,641 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Largo and the region

Centroid at 27.8975, -82.8146 · click any tract to drill in

Why Largo scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Largo
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
14.3% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,589 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Largo
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Largo
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Largo
6.9

How Largo compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Largo risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.34.3This tracttract 025207Largo: 2.42.4Largoparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 84

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 821Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 6.66%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.9%Peak (2000)
  • 43Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 121030252072000: 65 filings (10.85/100 renter HHs)2001: 55 filings (9.18/100 renter HHs)2002: 47 filings (7.85/100 renter HHs)2003: 25 filings (4.17/100 renter HHs)2004: 47 filings (7.85/100 renter HHs)2005: 57 filings (8.09/100 renter HHs)2006: 54 filings (7.66/100 renter HHs)2007: 36 filings (5.11/100 renter HHs)2008: 50 filings (7.09/100 renter HHs)2009: 32 filings (4.54/100 renter HHs)2010: 33 filings (4.47/100 renter HHs)2011: 38 filings (5.32/100 renter HHs)2012: 49 filings (6.86/100 renter HHs)2013: 48 filings (6.72/100 renter HHs)2014: 45 filings (6.30/100 renter HHs)2015: 54 filings (7.56/100 renter HHs)2016: 43 filings (5.14/100 renter HHs)2017: 43 filings (5.14/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 34% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 141Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.57×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-10-01: 9 filings (2.57× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-07-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (1.78× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-01-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-02-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-09-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Largo

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Largo eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pinellas County average of 4.8 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 84th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 821 eviction filings here over 18 tracked years, with about 6.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 10.9% of renter households in 2000.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12103025207

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12103025207?

Census tract 12103025207 in Largo scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12103025207?

Median gross rent is $1,589/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 71% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12103025207?

14.3% of residents in tract 12103025207 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,932.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12103025207?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 84th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 92th, minority 53th, housing 62th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12103025207?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 821 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 12103025207 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.66% of renter households, peaking at 10.9% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 12103025207 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.57× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 12103025207 compare to Largo overall?

Tract 12103025207 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Largo at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Largo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Largo

Top eight tracts in Largo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related