Ardsley Park-Chatham Crescent Historic District Eviction Risk: Lower , Savannah
Tract 13051002900 · Chatham County, GA · pop 2,773 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 13051002900 in the Ardsley Park-Chatham Crescent Historic District area of Savannah, GA reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,773 residents. 29% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Chatham County average of 46.6%.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Savannah and the region
Centroid at 32.0449, -81.0990 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ardsley Park-Chatham Crescent Historic District scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Ardsley Park-Chatham Crescent Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 10%Socioeconomic
- 8%Household composition
- 10%Racial/ethnic minority
- 2%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 11%Grade A
- 64%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 22Total filings over 1 yrs
- 5.06%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.1%Peak (2011)
- 22Filings in 2011 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Ardsley Park-Chatham Crescent Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.5%Housing insecurity
- 3.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.4%Food insecurity
- 3.5%SNAP enrollment
- 3.9%Transit barriers
- 5.9%No health insurance
- 12.5%Frequent mental distress
- 20.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Ardsley Park-Chatham Crescent Historic District
What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.6/10. Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10.
19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.9/10. SNAP participation runs 3.5% against 15.2% nationally.
It sits 1.1 points below the Chatham County average of 4.1. The filing record is not thin: 22 evictions over 1 years of observation. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
Filings peaked in 2011 at 5.1% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 5.1% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 19% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Against average income of $127,614, annual rent is just 13%.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 13051002900
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13051002900?
What is the average rent in tract 13051002900?
What is the poverty rate in tract 13051002900?
How socially vulnerable is tract 13051002900?
Is tract 13051002900 considered part of Ardsley Park-Chatham Crescent Historic District?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13051002900?
What share of households in tract 13051002900 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 13051002900 compare to Savannah overall?
Was tract 13051002900 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Savannah
Top eight tracts in Savannah ranked by composite eviction-risk score.