Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,681 of 84,120 nationally

Clayton Manor Eviction Risk: Moderate , Forest Park

Tract 13063040306 · Clayton County, GA · pop 4,600 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

With a score of 5.6/10, tract 13063040306 in the Clayton Manor area of Forest Park, GA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,600 residents. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.9/10.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 57% Stable renters 40% Owners 3%
Tract context
Occupied units1,837
Renter share96.6%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate22.6%
Median income$44,502

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Clayton Manor
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 7 tracts In Forest Park
Very High
Within county
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
High
Within state
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#319 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forest Park and the region

Centroid at 33.6043, -84.3869 · click any tract to drill in

Why Clayton Manor scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forest Park
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
22.6% poverty · this tract
5.7
Supply constraint
$1,182 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forest Park
7.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forest Park
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forest Park
7.2

How Clayton Manor compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Clayton Manor risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.6This tracttract 0403064.5Forest Parkparent city4.4Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 5,399Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 66.04%Avg annual filing rate
  • 61.7%Peak (2015)
  • 495Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 13063040306
Filings climbed 26% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 3,509Total filings 2020-21
  • 46.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Clayton Manor. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Clayton Manor

SNAP participation runs 38.2% against 15.2% nationally. 97% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.7/10. Housing insecurity runs 35.5% against 14.2% nationally. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.7/10.

15% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The poverty rate is 23%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Against the Clayton County average of 4.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.2 points.

Against Clayton County at 53.3%, 59% of renters here are cost-burdened. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 5,399 filings here across 11 tracked years. The worst year on record was 2015, when 61.7% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 66.0% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 73% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040306

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040306?

Census tract 13063040306 in the Clayton Manor neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040306?

Median gross rent is $1,182/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040306?

22.6% of residents in tract 13063040306 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,600.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040306?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 87th, minority 96th, housing 66th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040306 considered part of Clayton Manor?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040306 fall within Clayton Manor (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040306?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 5,399 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040306 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 66.04% of renter households, peaking at 61.7% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040306 struggle to pay rent?

About 35.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 23.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040306 compare to Forest Park overall?

Tract 13063040306 scores 5.6/10, higher than the parent city of Forest Park at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forest Park eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Forest Park

Top eight tracts in Forest Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related