Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,643 of 84,120 nationally

Clayton Manor Eviction Risk: Moderate , Forest Park

Tract 13063040307 · Clayton County, GA · pop 4,281 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Tract 13063040307 covers Clayton Manor in Forest Park in Georgia. Home to 4,281 residents, it scores $1/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 75% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 23% of renter households, a moderate level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,208 a month while the average household earns $60,586 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 25% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 19% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,371
Renter share24.9%
SVI overall0.72
Poverty rate13.5%
Median income$60,586

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Clayton Manor
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Forest Park
Very Low
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#38 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Moderate
Within state
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#1,028 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forest Park and the region

Centroid at 33.5988, -84.3625 · click any tract to drill in

Why Clayton Manor scores 4.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forest Park
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
13.5% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$1,208 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forest Park
7.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forest Park
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forest Park
7.2

How Clayton Manor compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Clayton Manor risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.24.2This tracttract 040307Forest Park: 2.82.8Forest Parkparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 72

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 837Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 15.44%Avg annual filing rate
  • 25.0%Peak (2015)
  • 77Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130630403072002: 37 filings (3.57/100 renter HHs)2005: 46 filings (5.23/100 renter HHs)2007: 58 filings (6.60/100 renter HHs)2008: 84 filings (9.55/100 renter HHs)2010: 71 filings (20.70/100 renter HHs)2011: 90 filings (21.63/100 renter HHs)2012: 100 filings (24.04/100 renter HHs)2013: 81 filings (19.47/100 renter HHs)2014: 89 filings (21.39/100 renter HHs)2015: 104 filings (25.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 77 filings (12.60/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 108% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 299Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Clayton Manor. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Clayton Manor

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Forest Park eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and Black and ranks around the 72nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 837 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 15.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 25.0% of renter households in 2015.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040307

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040307?

Census tract 13063040307 in the Clayton Manor neighborhood scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040307?

Median gross rent is $1,208/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040307?

13.5% of residents in tract 13063040307 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,281.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040307?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 72th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 63th, minority 90th, housing 15th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040307 considered part of Clayton Manor?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040307 fall within Clayton Manor (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040307?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 837 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040307 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.44% of renter households, peaking at 25.0% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040307 struggle to pay rent?

About 24.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040307 compare to Forest Park overall?

Tract 13063040307 scores 4.2/10, higher than the parent city of Forest Park at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forest Park eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Forest Park

Top eight tracts in Forest Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related