Within neighborhood
60
th percentile
Elevated
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,095 of 84,120 nationally
Magnificent Mile Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chicago
Tract 17031081202 · Cook County, IL · pop 3,437 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
With a score of 5.3/10, tract 17031081202 in the Magnificent Mile area of Chicago, IL reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,437 residents. 22% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Cook County average of 45.6%.
Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units2,094
Renter share28.5%
SVI overall0.08
Poverty rate6.3%
Median income$158,100
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
5
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
31
th percentile
Low
Within state
59
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.9044, -87.6242 · click any tract to drill in
Why Magnificent Mile scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
6.3% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$2,168 rent vs county FMR
7.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Magnificent Mile compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 8
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 1%Socioeconomic
- 10%Household composition
- 27%Racial/ethnic minority
- 47%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 34%Grade A
- 10%Grade B
- 23%Grade C
- 10%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 245Total filings over 15 yrs
- 3.16%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.0%Peak (2007)
- 8Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 20% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Magnificent Mile. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.0%Housing insecurity
- 2.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.1%Food insecurity
- 2.8%SNAP enrollment
- 2.8%Transit barriers
- 3.3%No health insurance
- 9.6%Frequent mental distress
- 19.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Magnificent Mile
At $2,168 a month, rents run 51% over what the rest of Chicago commands. The dominant input is local political climate at 8.5/10.
Running cool, economic stress reads 1.6/10. The voucher gap is 23.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.
SNAP participation runs 2.8% against 15.2% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 4.0% against 14.2% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 245 evictions over 15 years of observation.
It sits 0.8 points below the Cook County average of 6.1. The worst year on record was 2007, when 9.0% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031081202
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031081202?
Census tract 17031081202 in the Magnificent Mile neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031081202?
Median gross rent is $2,168/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 22% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031081202?
6.3% of residents in tract 17031081202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,437.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031081202?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 8th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 10th, minority 27th, housing 47th.
Q5
Is tract 17031081202 considered part of Magnificent Mile?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031081202 fall within Magnificent Mile (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031081202?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 245 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031081202 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.16% of renter households, peaking at 9.0% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031081202 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031081202 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031081202 scores 5.3/10, lower than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031081202 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 10% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · IL
Fifth City
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Oakwood Shores
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
The Bush
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
South Brighton
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Canaryville
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Edgewater Beach
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Roosevelt Square
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
South Brighton
8.1
/ 10 · High
Related