Palmer Square Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago
Tract 17031230100 · Cook County, IL · pop 1,636 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Tract 17031230100 sits in the Palmer Square area of Chicago eviction risk, IL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.8/10. It is home to 1,636 residents. Severe burden reaches 26%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.9120, -87.7044 · click any tract to drill in
Why Palmer Square scores 7.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Palmer Square compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 63
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 81%Socioeconomic
- 14%Household composition
- 78%Racial/ethnic minority
- 52%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 100%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 180Total filings over 14 yrs
- 2.97%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.3%Peak (2011)
- 5Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Palmer Square. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 17.3%Housing insecurity
- 9.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 20.6%Food insecurity
- 17.5%SNAP enrollment
- 10.1%Transit barriers
- 13.4%No health insurance
- 15.8%Frequent mental distress
- 24.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Palmer Square
What pushes it up most is local political climate at 8.5/10. It sits 1.7 points above the Cook County average of 6.1. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.
The poverty rate is 27%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.4/10.
Court records carry 180 eviction filings across 14 observed years. Average gross rent is $1,295, 10% below the Chicago average. The worst year on record was 2011, when 4.3% of renter households were served.
This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 3.0% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 89% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Against average income of $89,773, annual rent is just 17%.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 17031230100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031230100?
What is the average rent in tract 17031230100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031230100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031230100?
Is tract 17031230100 considered part of Palmer Square?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031230100?
What share of households in tract 17031230100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031230100 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031230100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.