Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,988 of 84,120 nationally

Palmer Square Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago

Tract 17031222700 · Cook County, IL · pop 2,202 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Tract 17031222700 sits in the Palmer Square area of Chicago eviction risk, IL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.2/10. Against Cook County at 45.6%, around a third of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
7.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 43% Owners 36%
Tract context
Occupied units819
Renter share63.6%
SVI overall0.85
Poverty rate18.7%
Median income$86,473

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 8 tracts In Palmer Square
High
Within parent city
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#409 of 792 tracts In Chicago
Moderate
Within county
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#459 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Elevated
Within state
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#517 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chicago and the region

Centroid at 41.9155, -87.7102 · click any tract to drill in

Why Palmer Square scores 7.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
18.7% poverty · this tract
4.7
Supply constraint
$1,639 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5

How Palmer Square compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Palmer Square risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.27.2This tracttract 222700Chicago: 6.76.7Chicagoparent cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 85

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 311Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 3.99%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.0%Peak (2002)
  • 16Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 170312227002001: 25 filings (4.97/100 renter HHs)2002: 40 filings (7.95/100 renter HHs)2003: 27 filings (5.37/100 renter HHs)2004: 24 filings (4.77/100 renter HHs)2005: 20 filings (3.95/100 renter HHs)2006: 30 filings (5.93/100 renter HHs)2007: 16 filings (3.16/100 renter HHs)2008: 14 filings (2.77/100 renter HHs)2009: 13 filings (2.57/100 renter HHs)2010: 11 filings (2.09/100 renter HHs)2011: 26 filings (4.66/100 renter HHs)2012: 16 filings (2.87/100 renter HHs)2013: 15 filings (2.69/100 renter HHs)2014: 18 filings (3.23/100 renter HHs)2015: 16 filings (2.87/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 36% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Palmer Square. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Palmer Square

The score leans hardest on local political climate at 8.5/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. Severe burden reaches 14%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points. On the high side, regional political climate reads 7.5/10. The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

The filing record is not thin: 311 evictions over 15 years of observation. At $1,639 a month, rents run 14% over what the rest of Chicago commands. Filings peaked in 2002 at 8.0% of renter households.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 4.0% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 86th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 17031222700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031222700?

Census tract 17031222700 in the Palmer Square neighborhood scores 7.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 17031222700?

Median gross rent is $1,639/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 17031222700?

18.7% of residents in tract 17031222700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,202.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 17031222700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 71th, minority 77th, housing 94th.
Q5

Is tract 17031222700 considered part of Palmer Square?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031222700 fall within Palmer Square (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031222700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 311 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031222700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.99% of renter households, peaking at 8.0% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 17031222700 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 17031222700 compare to Chicago overall?

Tract 17031222700 scores 7.2/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 17031222700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 98% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chicago

Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related