Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally

Riverview Eviction Risk: Lower , Fort Washington

Tract 24033801309 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 3,975 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 24033801309 sits in Riverview in Fort Washington eviction risk, Maryland eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.6/10. That is riskier than roughly 61% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

0% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,797 monthly, set against $174,719 in average yearly household income, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 3% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 3% Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units1,363
Renter share3.2%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate8.0%
Median income$174,719

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Riverview
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 7 tracts In Fort Washington
Moderate
Within county
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#178 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Very Low
Within state
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#1,188 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fort Washington and the region

Centroid at 38.7103, -77.0317 · click any tract to drill in

Why Riverview scores 1.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fort Washington
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
8.0% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,797 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Washington
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Washington
2.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Washington
5.2

How Riverview compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Riverview risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.51.5This tracttract 801309Fort Washington: 6.46.4Fort Washingtonparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 11

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 18Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 5.19%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.2%Peak (2011)
  • 2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 240338013092011: 7 filings (4.22/100 renter HHs)2012: 7 filings (4.22/100 renter HHs)2014: 2 filings (1.20/100 renter HHs)2016: 2 filings (11.11/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 71% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Riverview

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 7.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fort Washington eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and below the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 11th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033801309

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033801309?

Census tract 24033801309 in the Riverview neighborhood scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033801309?

Median gross rent is $1,797/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033801309?

8.0% of residents in tract 24033801309 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,975.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033801309?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 36th, minority 81th, housing 3th.
Q5

Is tract 24033801309 considered part of Riverview?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033801309 fall within Riverview (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033801309?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 18 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033801309 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.19% of renter households, peaking at 4.2% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033801309 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033801309 compare to Fort Washington overall?

Tract 24033801309 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Fort Washington at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Washington eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fort Washington

Top eight tracts in Fort Washington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related