Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally

Fort Foote Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Fort Washington

Tract 24033801410 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 3,623 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 24033801410 sits in the Fort Foote Village neighborhood of Fort Washington eviction risk, Maryland eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 7.1/10. On the national scale it ranks #3,598 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 57% of renter households, a severe level, and 51% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,620 a month against an average household income of $154,000 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 14% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 6% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,282
Renter share13.6%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate7.3%
Median income$154,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Fort Foote Village
Moderate
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 7 tracts In Fort Washington
Elevated
Within county
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#169 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Low
Within state
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#1,188 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fort Washington and the region

Centroid at 38.7564, -77.0238 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fort Foote Village scores 1.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fort Washington
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
7.3% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$2,620 rent vs county FMR
6.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Washington
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Washington
2.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Washington
5.2

How Fort Foote Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fort Foote Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.51.5This tracttract 801410Fort Washington: 6.46.4Fort Washingtonparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 9Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 4.15%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.8%Peak (2014)
  • 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 240338014102011: 2 filings (3.92/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (1.96/100 renter HHs)2014: 5 filings (9.80/100 renter HHs)2016: 1 filings (0.93/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fort Foote Village

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fort Washington eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and above the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 9 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 4.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 9.8% of renter households in 2014.

The tract is Black and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 41st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033801410

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033801410?

Census tract 24033801410 in the Fort Foote Village neighborhood scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033801410?

Median gross rent is $2,620/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033801410?

7.3% of residents in tract 24033801410 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,623.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033801410?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 55th, household 63th, minority 92th, housing 6th.
Q5

Is tract 24033801410 considered part of Fort Foote Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033801410 fall within Fort Foote Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033801410?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 9 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033801410 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.15% of renter households, peaking at 9.8% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033801410 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033801410 compare to Fort Washington overall?

Tract 24033801410 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Fort Washington at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Washington eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fort Washington

Top eight tracts in Fort Washington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related