Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,138 of 84,120 nationally

Pill Hill Eviction Risk: Elevated , Boston

Tract 25025081102 · Suffolk County, MA · pop 2,835 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 25025081102 sits in Pill Hill in Boston eviction risk, Massachusetts eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of $1/10. That is riskier than about 95% of US census tracts.

About 42% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,175 a month while the average household earns $89,253 a year, roughly 29% of income at the averages. Renters make up 67% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 39% Owners 33%
Tract context
Occupied units1,189
Renter share66.9%
SVI overall0.78
Poverty rate26.8%
Median income$89,253

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 8 tracts In Pill Hill
High
Within parent city
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#62 of 206 tracts In Boston
Elevated
Within county
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#64 of 234 tracts In Suffolk County
Elevated
Within state
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#110 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Boston and the region

Centroid at 42.3288, -71.1059 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pill Hill scores 6.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Boston
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.2
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
26.8% poverty · this tract
6.7
Supply constraint
$2,175 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Boston
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Boston
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Boston
8.0

How Pill Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pill Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.46.4This tracttract 081102Boston: 7.17.1Bostonparent cityCounty: 5.55.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 78

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 33Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.61×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2023-11-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Pill Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pill Hill

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Boston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Suffolk County average of 6.7 and above the Massachusetts statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 99% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 78th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 25025081102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25025081102?

Census tract 25025081102 in the Pill Hill neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 25025081102?

Median gross rent is $2,175/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 25025081102?

26.8% of residents in tract 25025081102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,835.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 25025081102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 78th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 63th, household 29th, minority 69th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 25025081102 considered part of Pill Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25025081102 fall within Pill Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 25025081102 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.61× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Boston eviction risk, MA), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 25025081102 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 25025081102 compare to Boston overall?

Tract 25025081102 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Boston at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Boston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 25025081102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 99% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Boston

Top eight tracts in Boston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related