Neighborhood · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally
Putterham Eviction Risk: Moderate , Boston
Tract 25025110601 ·
Suffolk County, MA · pop 3,009 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 25025110601 (Putterham in Boston, Massachusetts) comes in at 6.7/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 90% of US census tracts.
66% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 54% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,760 monthly, set against $140,000 in average yearly household income, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 30% of occupied homes.
Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20%Stable renters 10%Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units1,362
Renter share29.9%
SVI overall0.40
Poverty rate4.0%
Median income$140,000
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Putterham
Moderate
Within parent city
9th percentile
#187 of 206 tracts In Boston
Very Low
Within county
11th percentile
#209 of 234 tracts In Suffolk County
Very Low
Within state
63th percentile
#602 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Boston and the region
Centroid at 42.2983, -71.1400 · click any tract to drill in
Why Putterham scores 4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Boston
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.2
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,760 rent vs county FMR
4.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Boston
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Boston
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Boston
8.0
How Putterham compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 40
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
13%Socioeconomic
57%Household composition
28%Racial/ethnic minority
79%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
28%Grade A
44%Grade B
8%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
2Total filings over 2 yrs
0.42%Avg annual filing rate
0.4%Peak (2014)
1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2012 to 2016
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
5Total filings 2020-21
0.1Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
2.50×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2023-11-01
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
5.8%Housing insecurity
3.7%Utility-shutoff threat
6.0%Food insecurity
6.3%SNAP enrollment
4.3%Transit barriers
2.7%No health insurance
11.9%Frequent mental distress
23.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Putterham
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Boston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Suffolk County average of 6.7 and above the Massachusetts statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 40th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2 eviction filings here over 2 tracked years, with about 0.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 0.4% of renter households in 2014.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 25025110601
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25025110601?
Census tract 25025110601 in the Putterham neighborhood scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 25025110601?
Median gross rent is $2,760/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 66% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 25025110601?
4.0% of residents in tract 25025110601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,009.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 25025110601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 40th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 57th, minority 28th, housing 79th.
Q5
Is tract 25025110601 considered part of Putterham?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25025110601 fall within Putterham (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25025110601?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 25025110601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.42% of renter households, peaking at 0.4% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 25025110601 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 2.50× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Boston eviction risk, MA), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 25025110601 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 25025110601 compare to Boston overall?
Tract 25025110601 scores 4/10, lower than the parent city of Boston at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Boston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10
Was tract 25025110601 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Boston
Top eight tracts in Boston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.