Neighborhood · Ranked #18,240 of 84,120 nationally
Cary Square Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chelsea
Tract 25025160501 ·
Suffolk County, MA · pop 6,283 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Eviction risk in the Cary Square area of Chelsea centers on tract 25025160501, which scores 6.7/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 6,283 residents. That is riskier than roughly 90% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 65% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 45% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,724 a month while the average household earns $59,625 a year, roughly 35% of income at the averages. About 66% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 43%Stable renters 23%Owners 34%
Tract context
Occupied units1,971
Renter share66.4%
SVI overall0.85
Poverty rate16.0%
Median income$59,625
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In Cary Square
Very High
Within parent city
38th percentile
#6 of 9 tracts In Chelsea
Low
Within county
52th percentile
#112 of 234 tracts In Suffolk County
Moderate
Within state
84th percentile
#260 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chelsea and the region
Centroid at 42.3983, -71.0329 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cary Square scores 5.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chelsea
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.2
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
16.0% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,724 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chelsea
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chelsea
9.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chelsea
7.9
How Cary Square compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 85
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
81%Socioeconomic
81%Household composition
88%Racial/ethnic minority
71%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
96%Grade C
4%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
241Total filings over 5 yrs
3.69%Avg annual filing rate
4.1%Peak (2016)
54Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2012 to 2016
Filings climbed 32% over the past 5 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
149Total filings 2020-21
3.2Avg monthly (observed)
3.9Pre-pandemic baseline
0.82×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2023-11-01
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Cary Square. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
26.6%Housing insecurity
14.3%Utility-shutoff threat
30.5%Food insecurity
29.7%SNAP enrollment
15.6%Transit barriers
17.9%No health insurance
18.1%Frequent mental distress
32.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cary Square
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chelsea eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Suffolk County average of 6.7 and above the Massachusetts statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.82x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.
The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 85th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 25025160501
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25025160501?
Census tract 25025160501 in the Cary Square neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 25025160501?
Median gross rent is $1,724/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 25025160501?
16.0% of residents in tract 25025160501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,283.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 25025160501?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 81th, minority 88th, housing 71th.
Q5
Is tract 25025160501 considered part of Cary Square?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25025160501 fall within Cary Square (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25025160501?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 241 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 25025160501 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.69% of renter households, peaking at 4.1% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 25025160501 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.82× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Boston eviction risk, MA), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 25025160501 struggle to pay rent?
About 26.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 25025160501 compare to Chelsea overall?
Tract 25025160501 scores 5.5/10, lower than the parent city of Chelsea at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chelsea eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10
Was tract 25025160501 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 4% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chelsea
Top eight tracts in Chelsea ranked by composite eviction-risk score.