Census Tract · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally
Mount Morris Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 26049012310 ·
Genesee County, MI · pop 3,147
Census tract 26049012310 covers part of Mount Morris, MI, and scores 6/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,147 residents. Against Genesee County at 45.3%, 62% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%Stable renters 16%Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units1,315
Renter share41.4%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate28.2%
Median income$42,886
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Mount Morris
Moderate
Within county
97th percentile
#5 of 134 tracts In Genesee County
Very High
Within state
95th percentile
#141 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Very High
National
78th percentile
#18,163 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Mount Morris and the region
Centroid at 43.1177, -83.6987 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mount Morris scores 6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mount Morris
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
28.2% poverty · this tract
7.0
Supply constraint
$884 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mount Morris
9.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mount Morris
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mount Morris
9.1
How Mount Morris compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 86
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
90%Socioeconomic
88%Household composition
59%Racial/ethnic minority
63%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
21.2%Housing insecurity
16.9%Utility-shutoff threat
30.5%Food insecurity
33.3%SNAP enrollment
15.5%Transit barriers
10.2%No health insurance
24.5%Frequent mental distress
41.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Mount Morris
The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.7/10. The severe-burden share is 31%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 9.2/10. On the high side, housing-court posture reads 9.1/10. Against the Genesee County average of 4.3, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.7 points.
The poverty rate is 28%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Food insecurity runs 30.5% against 17.8% nationally.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 16.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. At $884 a month, rents run 12% under what the rest of Mount Morris commands. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Flint. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
Nationally it ranks #18,163 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 8.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the MI average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 26049012310
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26049012310?
Census tract 26049012310 in Mount Morris scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 26049012310?
Median gross rent is $884/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 26049012310?
28.2% of residents in tract 26049012310 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,147.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 26049012310?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 90th, household 88th, minority 59th, housing 63th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 26049012310 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 26049012310 compare to Mount Morris overall?
Tract 26049012310 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of Mount Morris at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mount Morris; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 26049012310 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.