Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #45,786 of 84,120 nationally

Creston Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lansing

Tract 26065000100 · Ingham County, MI · pop 1,775 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 26065000100 covers part of the Creston area of Lansing, MI, and scores 4.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,775 residents. 24% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Ingham County average of 46.5%.

Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 12% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units838
Renter share16.1%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate11.8%
Median income$52,905

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Creston
Very Low
Within parent city
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#29 of 41 tracts In Lansing
Low
Within county
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#48 of 84 tracts In Ingham County
Moderate
Within state
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#1,244 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lansing and the region

Centroid at 42.7606, -84.5464 · click any tract to drill in

Why Creston scores 4.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lansing
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
11.8% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$1,140 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lansing
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lansing
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lansing
4.5

How Creston compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Creston risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.2This tracttract 0001004.0Lansingparent city4.6Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 42

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Creston. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Creston

The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.4/10. The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 2/10. Average gross rent is $1,140, 15% above the Lansing average.

On the softer side, economic stress reads 3/10. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lansing. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #45,786 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

At 16% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Ingham County average of 4.6 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 26065000100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065000100?

Census tract 26065000100 in the Creston neighborhood scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26065000100?

Median gross rent is $1,140/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26065000100?

11.8% of residents in tract 26065000100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,775.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26065000100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 14th, minority 61th, housing 25th.
Q5

Is tract 26065000100 considered part of Creston?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26065000100 fall within Creston (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 26065000100 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 26065000100 compare to Lansing overall?

Tract 26065000100 scores 4.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Lansing at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lansing eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 26065000100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 13% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lansing

Top eight tracts in Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related