Creston Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lansing
Tract 26065003200 · Ingham County, MI · pop 1,997 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Tract 26065003200 sits in the Creston area of Lansing eviction risk, MI, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.5/10. It is home to 1,997 residents. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lansing and the region
Centroid at 42.7650, -84.5491 · click any tract to drill in
Why Creston scores 4.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Creston compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 76
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 77%Socioeconomic
- 87%Household composition
- 57%Racial/ethnic minority
- 48%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 70%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Creston. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 16.6%Housing insecurity
- 11.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 21.0%Food insecurity
- 19.8%SNAP enrollment
- 11.0%Transit barriers
- 10.2%No health insurance
- 20.0%Frequent mental distress
- 34.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Creston
Cost burden runs 33% here against 46.5% across Ingham County. 19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 2/10. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lansing. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
That is riskier than roughly 51% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.8/10.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Ingham County average of 4.6 closely.
Average gross rent is $982, close to the Lansing average. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $58,021.
38% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 26065003200
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065003200?
What is the average rent in tract 26065003200?
What is the poverty rate in tract 26065003200?
How socially vulnerable is tract 26065003200?
Is tract 26065003200 considered part of Creston?
What share of households in tract 26065003200 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 26065003200 compare to Lansing overall?
Was tract 26065003200 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Lansing
Top eight tracts in Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.