Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #54,273 of 84,120 nationally

Sherwood Forest Eviction Risk: Lower , Ferndale

Tract 26125173400 · Oakland County, MI · pop 5,166 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 26125173400 covers part of the Sherwood Forest area of Ferndale, MI, and scores 3.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,166 residents. Cost burden runs 23% here against 39.8% across Oakland County.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 16% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units2,598
Renter share20.8%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$106,927

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Sherwood Forest
Moderate
Within parent city
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 7 tracts In Ferndale
Very Low
Within county
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#182 of 350 tracts In Oakland County
Moderate
Within state
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#1,613 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ferndale and the region

Centroid at 42.4528, -83.1383 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sherwood Forest scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Ferndale
7.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,230 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ferndale
3.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ferndale
6.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ferndale
3.9

How Sherwood Forest compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sherwood Forest risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.7This tracttract 1734004.0Ferndaleparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sherwood Forest

The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.5/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.8/10. Disability prevalence runs 19.1% against 31.5% nationally.

12% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.2/10. Food insecurity runs 9.3% against 17.8% nationally.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #54,273 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Only 21% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Rent consumes only 14% of average household income of $106,927, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Oakland County average of 4.0 closely.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 26125173400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26125173400?

Census tract 26125173400 in the Sherwood Forest neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26125173400?

Median gross rent is $1,230/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26125173400?

7.1% of residents in tract 26125173400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,166.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26125173400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 14th, household 0th, minority 26th, housing 10th.
Q5

Is tract 26125173400 considered part of Sherwood Forest?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26125173400 fall within Sherwood Forest (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 26125173400 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 26125173400 compare to Ferndale overall?

Tract 26125173400 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of Ferndale at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ferndale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 26125173400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Ferndale

Top eight tracts in Ferndale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related