Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally
Crissfield Eviction Risk: Lower , Rochester Hills
Tract 26125194100 · Oakland County, MI · pop 2,857 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
The Moderate-tier score of 5.3/10 for census tract 26125194100 reflects conditions in the Crissfield neighborhood of Rochester Hills, Michigan. It lands near the 49th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Average household income is about $129,457 a year. Renters make up 0% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 60% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%
Stable renters 0%
Owners 100%
Tract context
Occupied units1,096
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate2.2%
Median income$129,457
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
21
th percentile
Low
Within county
10
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
2
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rochester Hills and the region
Centroid at 42.6423, -83.1409 · click any tract to drill in
Why Crissfield scores 1.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Rochester Hills
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
2.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rochester Hills
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rochester Hills
5.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rochester Hills
3.8
How Crissfield compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 2%Socioeconomic
- 24%Household composition
- 24%Racial/ethnic minority
- 9%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.9%Housing insecurity
- 4.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.7%Food insecurity
- 4.7%SNAP enrollment
- 4.1%Transit barriers
- 3.7%No health insurance
- 13.2%Frequent mental distress
- 19.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Crissfield
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 5.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rochester Hills eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Oakland County average of 5.7 and below the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 3rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 5.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 26125194100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26125194100?
Census tract 26125194100 in the Crissfield neighborhood scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 26125194100?
2.2% of residents in tract 26125194100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,857.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 26125194100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 24th, minority 24th, housing 9th.
Q4
Is tract 26125194100 considered part of Crissfield?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26125194100 fall within Crissfield (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q5
What share of households in tract 26125194100 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 26125194100 compare to Rochester Hills overall?
Tract 26125194100 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Rochester Hills at 2.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rochester Hills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rochester Hills
Top eight tracts in Rochester Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · MI
Meadowbrook
4.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MI
Pine Trail
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · MI
Auburn Highlands
3.2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · MI
John R Highlands
2.2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · MI
Avon Lakes Village
2.1
/ 10 · Low
Tract · MI
Woodgrove of Avon Hills
1.9
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · MI
Avon Hollow
1.8
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · MI
Barclay
1.7
/ 10 · Very Low
Related