Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Kensington Forest Eviction Risk: Lower , Rochester Hills

Tract 26125194600 · Oakland County, MI · pop 4,728 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 26125194600 in the Kensington Forest area of Rochester Hills, MI reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,728 residents. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.5/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 10% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,874
Renter share16.4%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate1.5%
Median income$118,926

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Kensington Forest
Moderate
Within parent city
32 th percentile
Rank, 32nd percentileLowHigh
#14 of 20 tracts In Rochester Hills
Low
Within county
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileLowHigh
#258 of 350 tracts In Oakland County
Low
Within state
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileLowHigh
#2,190 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rochester Hills and the region

Centroid at 42.6316, -83.1552 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kensington Forest scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rochester Hills
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
1.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,545 rent vs county FMR
6.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rochester Hills
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rochester Hills
5.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rochester Hills
3.8

How Kensington Forest compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kensington Forest risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 1946004.0Rochester Hillsparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kensington Forest

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. 18% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Disability prevalence runs 19.5% against 31.5% nationally. Against the Oakland County average of 4.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.0 points. SNAP participation runs 5.9% against 15.2% nationally.

On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.9/10. The voucher gap is 12.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 16% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Against average income of $118,926, annual rent is just 16%. Statewide the MI average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 26125194600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26125194600?

Census tract 26125194600 in the Kensington Forest neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26125194600?

Median gross rent is $1,545/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26125194600?

1.5% of residents in tract 26125194600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,728.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26125194600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 24th, minority 34th, housing 28th.
Q5

Is tract 26125194600 considered part of Kensington Forest?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26125194600 fall within Kensington Forest (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 26125194600 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 26125194600 compare to Rochester Hills overall?

Tract 26125194600 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Rochester Hills at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rochester Hills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rochester Hills

Top eight tracts in Rochester Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related