Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally

Crystal Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 27053020902 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 2,541

Census tract 27053020902 covers part of Crystal, MN, and scores 3.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. 27% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Hennepin County average of 43.1%.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 8% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units928
Renter share11.0%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate3.9%
Median income$110,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Crystal
Very Low
Within county
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#240 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#1,082 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,558 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Crystal and the region

Centroid at 45.0273, -93.3620 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crystal scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Crystal
7.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
3.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,891 rent vs county FMR
6.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Crystal
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Crystal
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Crystal
6.6

How Crystal compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crystal risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.3This tracttract 0209024.2Crystalparent city5.1Countyavg tract in county4.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 23Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 7.75%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.5%Peak (2013)
  • 10Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 27053020902
Filings climbed 100% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 14Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.58×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crystal

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.8/10.

Average gross rent is $1,891, 29% above the Crystal average. Against the Hennepin County average of 5.1, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.8 points. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.4/10.

SNAP participation runs 5.9% against 15.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 23 filings here across 5 tracked years.

Food insecurity runs 9.5% against 17.8% nationally. The voucher gap is 12.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Filings peaked in 2013 at 9.5% of renter households.

In a typical year about 7.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #61,558 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053020902

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053020902?

Census tract 27053020902 in Crystal scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053020902?

Median gross rent is $1,891/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053020902?

3.9% of residents in tract 27053020902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,541.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053020902?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 14th, household 23th, minority 41th, housing 10th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053020902?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 23 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053020902 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.75% of renter households, peaking at 9.5% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 27053020902 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.58× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27053020902 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27053020902 compare to Crystal overall?

Tract 27053020902 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Crystal at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Crystal eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Crystal

Top eight tracts in Crystal ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related