Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,198 of 84,120 nationally

Rondo Eviction Risk: Elevated , St. Paul

Tract 27123033700 · Ramsey County, MN · pop 1,662 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 27123033700 sits in the Rondo area of St. Paul, Minnesota eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 7.3/10. It lands near the 97th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 49% of renter households, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $770 a month while the average household earns $22,500 a year, roughly 41% of income at the averages. About 98% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 48% Stable renters 50% Owners 2%
Tract context
Occupied units694
Renter share98.3%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate41.2%
Median income$22,500

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 16 tracts In Rondo
Very High
Within parent city
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 85 tracts In St. Paul
Very High
Within county
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 143 tracts In Ramsey County
Very High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#31 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across St. Paul and the region

Centroid at 44.9530, -93.1109 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rondo scores 6.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. Paul
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
41.2% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$770 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Paul
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Paul
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Paul
7.5

How Rondo compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rondo risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.96.9This tracttract 033700St. Paul: 6.66.6St. Paulparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 118Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 2.96%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.2%Peak (2012)
  • 9Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 271230337002009: 23 filings (4.68/100 renter HHs)2010: 14 filings (2.47/100 renter HHs)2011: 14 filings (2.35/100 renter HHs)2012: 25 filings (4.19/100 renter HHs)2013: 18 filings (3.02/100 renter HHs)2014: 15 filings (2.51/100 renter HHs)2015: 9 filings (1.51/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 61% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 143Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.51×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-07-01: 6 filings (3.70× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-09-01: 4 filings (5.33× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2023-02-01: 3 filings (2.68× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (1.79× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (3.09× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (3.20× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (8.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (8.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (1.23× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-09-01: 8 filings (10.67× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (6.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 6 filings (4.80× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (3.70× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (2.47× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (8.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rondo. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rondo

The heaviest input here is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Paul eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Ramsey County average of 6.0 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 118 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 3.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.2% of renter households in 2012.

The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 99th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 27123033700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27123033700?

Census tract 27123033700 in the Rondo neighborhood scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27123033700?

Median gross rent is $770/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27123033700?

41.2% of residents in tract 27123033700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,662.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27123033700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 98th, minority 84th, housing 97th.
Q5

Is tract 27123033700 considered part of Rondo?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27123033700 fall within Rondo (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27123033700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 118 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 27123033700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.96% of renter households, peaking at 4.2% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27123033700 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.51× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27123033700 struggle to pay rent?

About 35.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 28.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27123033700 compare to St. Paul overall?

Tract 27123033700 scores 6.9/10, higher than the parent city of St. Paul at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Paul eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 27123033700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 86% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in St. Paul

Top eight tracts in St. Paul ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related