Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #48,956 of 84,120 nationally

Black Jack Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 29189210806 · St. Louis County, MO · pop 5,091 · 43% of tract blocks fall in Black Jack

29189210806 is a census tract in Black Jack, MO. It scores 4/10 for landlords. Severe burden reaches 52%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 7% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units2,225
Renter share20.5%
SVI overall0.72
Poverty rate4.4%
Median income$68,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Black Jack
Very Low
Within county
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#96 of 236 tracts In St. Louis County
Elevated
Within state
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#604 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Elevated
National
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#48,956 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Black Jack and the region

Centroid at 38.7896, -90.2490 · click any tract to drill in

Why Black Jack scores 4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Black Jack
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
4.4% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,149 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Black Jack
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Black Jack
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Black Jack
7.5

How Black Jack compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Black Jack risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.0This tracttract 2108064.0Black Jackparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 72

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 941Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 20.54%Avg annual filing rate
  • 17.5%Peak (2013)
  • 130Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 29189210806
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,146Total filings 2020-21
  • 14.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 10.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.44×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Black Jack

Against St. Louis County at 42.0%, 68% of renters here are cost-burdened. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.1/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.5/10. Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10.

Court records carry 941 eviction filings across 8 observed years. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 16.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2013 at 17.5% of renter households.

In a typical year about 20.5% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 42nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 20% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 7.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 29189210806

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29189210806?

Census tract 29189210806 in Black Jack scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29189210806?

Median gross rent is $1,149/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29189210806?

4.4% of residents in tract 29189210806 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,091.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29189210806?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 72th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 77th, minority 89th, housing 45th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29189210806?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 941 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 29189210806 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 20.54% of renter households, peaking at 17.5% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 29189210806 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.44× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 29189210806 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 29189210806 compare to Black Jack overall?

Tract 29189210806 scores 4/10, right in line with the parent city of Black Jack at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Black Jack; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Black Jack

Top eight tracts in Black Jack ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related